07-13-2007, 02:37 PM
Race is such a hot topic in our everyday social and political discourse that it inevitably rises to the forefront of most such discussions. But whenever race comes up as an issue in conversation, I find myself frequently wondering whether or not race is actually at the heart of the issue.
Far too often, in my opinion, issues assumed to be ones of race are actually issued of economic and social status. Before I give an example, I know the first response will be that issues of race and social/economic status can not be separted. I believe, however, that they can be looked at empirically as separate issues.
For example, most people go into a conversation about affirmative action assuming that race itself is a barrier to higher education. But if we look from a different angle, is that really still the case? I firmly believe that a wealthy black student is far more likely to succeed academically than a poor white student. The wealthy have access and opportunity that the poor do not have, and that fact crosses racial boundaries. Furthermore, if that theoretical black student has two parents instead of one, has a family who places importances on proper manners, proper attire, and schooling in general, then I believe that black student will have every opportunity to succeed in this world. In fact, he or she may have BETTER opportunities than a white counterpart because so many people look at smart black people as extraordinarily valuable commodities in a workplace that places (or perhaps I should say misplaces) such high value on diversity. As a white person, I would truly and honestly feel at a disadvantage competing for a job with a black person of equal intelligence because there is a pervasive feeling in the business world today that smart white people are a dime a dozen, but a smart black person is a real find and an asset to any firm.
There are plenty of other examples of the cross cutting effects of race and economics, but I think the other one that strikes me as obvious is the supposed lack of equality in the criminal justice system, specifically with regards to the death penalty. People assume, once again, that the death penalty is racist or at the very least an issue of race. I think it is nothing of the sort. The same analogy can be applied to this situation, as a rich, successful black man (see Orenthal James Simpson) is far less likely to get the death penalty than a poor white person. Why? Because he has better attorneys and more access to resources. So it doesn't matter if one is white or black; what matters is if one is wealthy, poor, or somewhere in between. Poor people with public defenders will see much harsher sentences than their wealthier counterparts.
Perhaps I am in small company with these beliefs, but I think this lens is equally as legitimate a way of analyzing these issues as any other. We should never assume something to be true unless it is statistically proven, and I don't believe that sufficient proof exists to prove that race itself is a disadvantage in either of these two situations. And there are certainly many others which have not been mentioned yet.
Far too often, in my opinion, issues assumed to be ones of race are actually issued of economic and social status. Before I give an example, I know the first response will be that issues of race and social/economic status can not be separted. I believe, however, that they can be looked at empirically as separate issues.
For example, most people go into a conversation about affirmative action assuming that race itself is a barrier to higher education. But if we look from a different angle, is that really still the case? I firmly believe that a wealthy black student is far more likely to succeed academically than a poor white student. The wealthy have access and opportunity that the poor do not have, and that fact crosses racial boundaries. Furthermore, if that theoretical black student has two parents instead of one, has a family who places importances on proper manners, proper attire, and schooling in general, then I believe that black student will have every opportunity to succeed in this world. In fact, he or she may have BETTER opportunities than a white counterpart because so many people look at smart black people as extraordinarily valuable commodities in a workplace that places (or perhaps I should say misplaces) such high value on diversity. As a white person, I would truly and honestly feel at a disadvantage competing for a job with a black person of equal intelligence because there is a pervasive feeling in the business world today that smart white people are a dime a dozen, but a smart black person is a real find and an asset to any firm.
There are plenty of other examples of the cross cutting effects of race and economics, but I think the other one that strikes me as obvious is the supposed lack of equality in the criminal justice system, specifically with regards to the death penalty. People assume, once again, that the death penalty is racist or at the very least an issue of race. I think it is nothing of the sort. The same analogy can be applied to this situation, as a rich, successful black man (see Orenthal James Simpson) is far less likely to get the death penalty than a poor white person. Why? Because he has better attorneys and more access to resources. So it doesn't matter if one is white or black; what matters is if one is wealthy, poor, or somewhere in between. Poor people with public defenders will see much harsher sentences than their wealthier counterparts.
Perhaps I am in small company with these beliefs, but I think this lens is equally as legitimate a way of analyzing these issues as any other. We should never assume something to be true unless it is statistically proven, and I don't believe that sufficient proof exists to prove that race itself is a disadvantage in either of these two situations. And there are certainly many others which have not been mentioned yet.